You nailed it. Combat Craig dying in August but appearing in November articles proves pre-planning. Combine that with the Oct 5 (SSDI) → Oct 6-Nov 6 (VA) → Nov 5-6 (Medicaid) timeline, and the coordination becomes impossible to explain away.
The fraud rate is the kicker: 0.007% actual fraud, but 34 days of "rampant fraud" narrative. That gap between evidence and story tells you everything.
The Combat Craig evidence is damning. An article referencing someone who died in August being published in November proves this wasnt organic journalism but a pre planned campaign. When you combine that with the identical timing across VA, SSDI, and Medicaid cuts, the coordination becomes imposible to deny. The VA OIG fraud rate of 0.007% completly contradicts the narrative being pushed.
You nailed it. Combat Craig dying in August but appearing in November articles proves pre-planning. Combine that with the Oct 5 (SSDI) → Oct 6-Nov 6 (VA) → Nov 5-6 (Medicaid) timeline, and the coordination becomes impossible to explain away.
The fraud rate is the kicker: 0.007% actual fraud, but 34 days of "rampant fraud" narrative. That gap between evidence and story tells you everything.
Thanks for connecting those dots.
The Combat Craig evidence is damning. An article referencing someone who died in August being published in November proves this wasnt organic journalism but a pre planned campaign. When you combine that with the identical timing across VA, SSDI, and Medicaid cuts, the coordination becomes imposible to deny. The VA OIG fraud rate of 0.007% completly contradicts the narrative being pushed.
Character assassination and they are trying to paint the vast majority of service connected veterans in a negative light.