🟥 Troops in LA Today. Where Tomorrow?

Trump’s National Guard Memo Targets One City—but Opens the Door to Deployment Anywhere

When I first read the memo, my stomach turned—not because of what it said, but because of what it left unsaid.

On June 7, 2025, President Trump signed a Presidential Memorandum authorizing the use of 2,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles. On the surface, it reads like a response to protests—ICE raids, federal property at risk, the usual justifications.

But beneath that surface, something far more dangerous is taking shape.

This wasn’t a deployment under Title 32, which leaves control with the state governor. It was a Title 10 action—meaning those troops are now under direct federal command. That’s not just a difference in paperwork. It’s a shift in power. And it matters.

---

🔍 WHAT THE MEMO SAYS (AND DOESN’T SAY)

The language of the memo focuses on Los Angeles. It references immigration-related protests, ICE enforcement clashes, and the need to secure federal buildings.

But it does not limit the federalized troops to Los Angeles.

There is no geographic restriction in the text. Once activated under Title 10, those Guard troops are part of the U.S. military chain of command—and can be redeployed anywhere in the country at the president’s discretion.

In short: what began as a localized response now gives the White House a flexible tool for domestic troop deployment nationwide.

---

🚨 TITLE 10: THE BACKDOOR TO NATIONAL TROOP MOBILIZATION

To understand why this matters, you have to understand Title 10 of the U.S. Code. Under Title 10, National Guard units become indistinguishable from federal troops. Governors lose control. Congress need not be consulted. And the Insurrection Act doesn’t even have to be invoked—because this isn’t about rebellion. It’s about "federal interests."

That’s a term vague enough to mean almost anything:

• A protest at a federal courthouse?

• A blockade of a federal road?

• Online speech critical of ICE operations?

If the precedent stands, all of these could be justification for troop deployment in the name of "protecting federal property."

---

⚖️ THE DILEMMA FOR TROOPS: OBEY ORDERS OR UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION?

I’ve worn the uniform. I know what it means to swear an oath to the Constitution.
But if I were still serving today and got that deployment order?
I’d be facing a gut-wrenching choice.

Troops are trained to follow lawful orders. But what happens when those orders place them in the middle of domestic protests?
What happens when the “mission” is to suppress American civilians exercising First Amendment rights?

Under the Posse Comitatus Act, the use of federal military forces for domestic law enforcement is generally prohibited—yet Title 10 deployments can blur that line dangerously.

This isn’t just a legal grey zone—it’s a moral crisis waiting to unfold. And one many service members never imagined facing on American soil.

---

💣 A TACTICAL SETUP DISGUISED AS LAW AND ORDER

Trump’s use of the Guard isn’t just a one-off. It’s a trial balloon. A way to test how far he can go with minimal resistance.

And the setup is chilling:

• He starts in one city.

• Establishes control using Title 10.

• Justifies it with vague, open-ended language.

• Then, when the next “emergency” happens—he already has precedent.

If this sounds familiar, it should. This is how federal authority expands—not with sweeping declarations, but with strategic plays that slide beneath the headlines.

---

🧵 WHAT VETERANS—AND ALL AMERICANS—NEED TO WATCH

This isn’t just a procedural question. It’s a test of constitutional limits.

If the president can use one city’s unrest to justify nationwide military authority, we are no longer living in the system we thought we were defending.

This is the kind of maneuver that needs scrutiny—not silence.

---

📣 BOTTOM LINE:

The Los Angeles memorandum is not about Los Angeles.
It’s about setting the stage for something bigger.
And unless we speak up now, we may find the National Guard in places we never expected.

---

✍️
THANK YOU FOR READING, AND FOR STANDING WATCH WITH ME.
THESE AREN’T EASY TOPICS, BUT I BELIEVE WE FACE THEM BETTER WHEN WE FACE THEM TOGETHER.
—TBIRD
🔗

HTTPS://TBIRDSQUIETFIGHT.COM